Skip to content

How Naismith's Rule Works

Naismith's Rule is the original and most widely-used formula for estimating hiking time. Created in 1892 by Scottish mountaineer William W. Naismith, this simple yet effective rule has helped hikers plan their journeys for over a century.

The History Behind the Rule

William W. Naismith was a founding member of the Scottish Mountaineering Club. In 1892, he proposed a straightforward formula based on his extensive experience in the Scottish Highlands. His goal was simple: give hikers a reliable way to estimate how long a route would take, accounting for both distance and elevation gain.

What makes Naismith's Rule remarkable is its enduring accuracy. Despite being developed over 130 years ago, it remains the baseline method used by hiking organizations, guidebooks, and modern apps worldwide.

The Formula Explained

Naismith's Rule has two components:

Base Formula:

  • Distance component: 5 kilometers per hour (3.1 miles per hour) on flat ground
  • Ascent component: Add 1 hour for every 600 meters (approximately 2,000 feet) of elevation gain

In imperial units, this translates to:

  • Walk at 3 mph on flat terrain
  • Add 30 minutes for every 1,000 feet of climbing

Simple Example

Let's say you're planning a 10-mile hike with 3,000 feet of elevation gain:

  1. Distance time: 10 miles ÷ 3 mph = 3.33 hours (3 hours 20 minutes)
  2. Ascent time: 3,000 feet ÷ 1,000 = 3 × 30 minutes = 1.5 hours (1 hour 30 minutes)
  3. Total time: 3 hours 20 minutes + 1 hour 30 minutes = 4 hours 50 minutes

This is your estimated moving time—the time you'll spend actually hiking, not including breaks for lunch, photos, or rest.

When Naismith's Rule Works Well

Naismith's Rule is most accurate for:

  • Moderate terrain: Well-maintained trails without technical scrambling
  • Average fitness hikers: People with regular hiking experience
  • Typical conditions: Dry trails in moderate weather
  • Moderate slopes: Neither extremely steep nor extremely gentle
  • Shorter to medium hikes: Under 6-8 hours of hiking time

The formula was originally developed for Scottish mountain walks, which typically involve good trails with moderate to steep ascents. If your hike matches these conditions, Naismith's Rule will likely give you a solid estimate.

Where the Formula Falls Short

While Naismith's Rule is a great starting point, it has some known limitations:

1. Ignores Descent

The original formula doesn't account for downhill hiking. In practice, steep descents can slow you down significantly, especially:

  • On rocky or loose terrain
  • When carrying a heavy pack
  • If you have knee issues
  • In snow or mud

Solution: Many hikers add 10 minutes per 1,000 feet of descent on steep downhills.

2. Assumes Average Fitness

Naismith was an experienced mountaineer, and his "average" pace might be faster than yours—or slower! Your actual pace depends on:

  • Your fitness level and hiking experience
  • Your age and physical condition
  • Recent training and acclimatization

Solution: After a few hikes, you'll learn your personal multiplier (e.g., Naismith × 1.15 for novices, × 0.9 for very fit hikers).

3. Doesn't Account for Terrain Difficulty

The formula assumes good trail conditions. It doesn't adjust for:

  • Rocky scrambles or boulder fields
  • Stream crossings or muddy sections
  • Snow and ice requiring microspikes or crampons
  • Off-trail hiking through brush

Solution: Apply terrain multipliers (typically 1.15× to 1.5× for difficult conditions).

4. Extreme Conditions

Naismith's Rule struggles with:

  • Very long days: Fatigue accumulates on 10+ hour hikes
  • High altitude: Above 10,000 feet, you naturally slow down
  • Extreme weather: Heat, cold, wind, or heavy rain all affect pace
  • Heavy packs: 40+ pound loads significantly slow your pace

Solution: Use advanced methods like Tranter's corrections or Langmuir adjustments for these scenarios.

5. Very Steep or Very Gentle Slopes

The linear ascent formula (1 hour per 600m) is less accurate on:

  • Extremely steep climbs: You'll slow down more than the formula predicts
  • Very gentle inclines: The formula may overestimate the impact

Solution: Use Tobler's Hiking Function, which accounts for slope steepness with a more sophisticated curve.

Worked Example: 10-Mile New England Day Hike

Let's plan a realistic hike with Naismith's Rule:

Route: Mount Monadnock White Dot Trail (New Hampshire)

  • Distance: 4 miles round trip (2 miles up, 2 miles down)
  • Elevation gain: 1,800 feet
  • Elevation loss: 1,800 feet
  • Terrain: Rocky trail with some scrambling
  • Fitness: Average hiker

Basic Naismith Calculation

  1. Distance time: 4 miles ÷ 3 mph = 1.33 hours (1 hour 20 minutes)
  2. Ascent time: 1,800 feet ÷ 1,000 = 1.8 × 30 min = 54 minutes
  3. Base total: 1 hour 20 minutes + 54 minutes = 2 hours 14 minutes

Adjustments for Realism

Now let's add practical adjustments:

  1. Descent penalty: Add 10 min per 1,000 ft = 18 minutes
  2. Terrain difficulty: Rocky sections, multiply by 1.15× = add ~15 minutes
  3. Adjusted total: 2 hours 14 minutes + 18 + 15 = 2 hours 47 minutes

Final Estimate

Add breaks:

  • Quick snack breaks: 10 minutes
  • Summit time (photos, lunch): 20 minutes
  • Total trip time: ~3 hours 15 minutes

This matches real-world experience for Monadnock—most hikers complete the White Dot loop in 3-4 hours.

Comparison to Other Methods

| Method | Same Hike Estimate | Best For | |--------|-------------------|----------| | Naismith's Rule | 2h 47m | Moderate trails, average fitness | | Book Time | 3h 0m | Conservative planning, beginners | | Tobler's Function | 2h 52m | Variable terrain, slope accuracy |

Naismith typically falls in the middle—faster than Book Time's conservative estimate, similar to Tobler's physics-based model.

Tips for Using Naismith's Rule

1. Track Your Personal Pace

After 3-5 hikes, calculate your actual time vs. Naismith's estimate. You might discover you're consistently 10-20% faster or slower. Use this personal multiplier for future planning.

2. Start Conservative

On your first few hikes, add a 20-30% buffer to Naismith's estimate. Better to finish early than get caught after dark!

3. Check Against Multiple Methods

Use our hiking time calculator to compare Naismith, Book Time, and Tobler estimates. If they all agree within 20-30 minutes, you can be confident in your plan.

4. Account for Group Dynamics

Hiking with others? Your pace will match the slowest person. Add 15-25% for groups of 4 or more.

5. Consider the Season

  • Summer: Longer daylight hours give you flexibility
  • Winter: Shorter days require conservative estimates and early starts
  • Mud season: Add 20-30% for slow, sloppy trails

When to Use Naismith vs. Other Methods

Choose Naismith's Rule when:

  • You want a quick, mental math estimate
  • Your hike is moderate terrain on established trails
  • You're an intermediate hiker with average fitness
  • You're planning shorter day hikes (under 8 hours)

Consider other methods when:

  • Book Time: You're a beginner, want conservative estimates, or hiking in the White Mountains
  • Tobler's Function: You have variable terrain, steep descents, or need slope-specific accuracy
  • Tranter/Langmuir: You're planning long expeditions, have fitness extremes, or face challenging conditions

Conclusion

Naismith's Rule remains the gold standard for hiking time estimation because it's simple, memorable, and surprisingly accurate for typical conditions. While modern formulas add sophistication for specific scenarios, Naismith's 5 km/h + 600m/h formula is often all you need.

The key is understanding when to apply it directly and when to add adjustments for terrain, fitness, and conditions. With practice, you'll develop an intuition for how the formula applies to your hiking style.

Ready to test it out? Try our hiking time calculator to see how Naismith's Rule compares to other methods for your next adventure.

Further Reading


References:

  • Naismith, W. W. (1892). "Excursions: Cruach Ardran, Stobinian, and Ben More." Scottish Mountaineering Club Journal.
  • Langmuir, E. (1984). "Mountaincraft and Leadership." Scottish Sports Council.
  • Scarf, P. (1998). "Route planning and estimation of journey time." Journal of Navigation.